(No caption)

Featured_screen_shot_2016-11-23_at_11.30.26_am_23980

Updated: Wed., 2:15 p.m. -- Chris Thomas, who heads Michigan's Bureau of Elections, expressed skepticism. He tells the Detroit Free Press that Michigan doesn't use the electronic voting machines identified in the report as being the sources of potential hacking.

"We are an entire paper and optical scan state," Thomas told the Free Press this morning. "Nothing is connected to the Internet."

__________________________________

Report From Earlier Today

This sounds rather messy and like wishful thinking on the part of some anti-Trump voters.

Hillary Clinton is being urged by election lawyers and a group of prominent computer scientists -- including one from the University of Michigan --  to call for a recount in three swing states that went to Donald Trump: Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania, New York magazine reports. 

Gabriel Sherman writes:

The group, which includes voting-rights attorney John Bonifaz and J. Alex Halderman, the director of the University of Michigan Center for Computer Security and Society, believes they’ve found persuasive evidence that results in Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania may have been manipulated or hacked. The group is so far not speaking on the record about their findings and is focused on lobbying the Clinton team in private.

Last Thursday, the activists held a conference call with Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta and campaign general counsel Marc Elias to make their case, according to a source briefed on the call. The academics presented findings showing that in Wisconsin, Clinton received 7 percent fewer votes in counties that relied on electronic-voting machines compared with counties that used optical scanners and paper ballots. Based on this statistical analysis, Clinton may have been denied as many as 30,000 votes; she lost Wisconsin by 27,000. While it’s important to note the group has not found proof of hacking or manipulation, they are arguing to the campaign that the suspicious pattern merits an independent review — especially in light of the fact that the Obama White House has accused the Russian government of hacking the Democratic National Committee.

According to current tallies, Trump has won 290 Electoral College votes to Clinton’s 232, with Michigan’s 16 votes not apportioned because the race there is still too close to call. It would take overturning the results in both Wisconsin (10 Electoral College votes) and Pennsylvania (20 votes), in addition to winning Michigan’s 16, for Clinton to win the Electoral College. There is also the complicating factor of “faithless electors,” or members of the Electoral College who do not vote according to the popular vote in their states. At least six electoral voters have said they would not vote for Trump, despite the fact that he won their states.

Time for a challenge is running out. The deadline to file for a recount is Friday in Wisconsin, Monday in Pennsylvania and  next Wednesday in Michigan. 

Read more: New York magazine